Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2022-05-09 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 12.95 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Green and Orange | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 480 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6781 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8380mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 9.2 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet is way better than the Blackview BL8800, with a global score of 87.1 against 71.9. LG Velvet's design is way lighter and extremely thinner than the Blackview BL8800, although it was released many years before. LG Velvet counts with just a little better hardware performance than Blackview BL8800, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Blackview BL8800 has a little bit better screen than LG Velvet, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2408 resolution and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better number of pixels per screen inch. LG Velvet counts with a very superior storage to store more games and applications than Blackview BL8800, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the LG Velvet also has a SD card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The LG Velvet features a very superior camera than Blackview BL8800, although it has a less MP resolution camera, they both have a same size aperture. The Blackview BL8800 counts with a much better battery life than LG Velvet, because it has a 95 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.