Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-05-09 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 12.95 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black, Green and Orange | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 480 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6781 (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8380mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 9.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50s has a general score of 86.6, which is way better than the Blackview BL8800's score of 71.9. Both of these devices have Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A50s has an older 10 version and Blackview BL8800 has Android 11 version. Despite of the fact that the Samsung Galaxy A50s is older than Blackview BL8800, it's construction is a lot thinner and incredibly lighter.
Blackview BL8800 features just a bit better display than Galaxy A50s, because although it has a bit lower quantity of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a bit bigger screen and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2408. The Samsung Galaxy A50s features a much greater storage for applications and games than Blackview BL8800, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with a bit better performance than Blackview BL8800, although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. Blackview BL8800 has a much better battery duration than Galaxy A50s, because it has a 110 percent larger battery capacity. The Galaxy A50s shoots a lot better videos and photos than Blackview BL8800, although it has a less MP resolution camera in the back and a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light photos and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.