Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2022-05-09 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 12.95 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Green and Orange | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| 480 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6781 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8380mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 9.2 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S9 is better than Blackview BL8800, with a general score of 83.3 against 71.9. Samsung Galaxy S9 is an noticeably older device than Blackview BL8800, but Samsung could make it notably thinner and incredibly lighter anyway. Samsung Galaxy S9 features a bit better processing unit than Blackview BL8800, although it has 4 GB less RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The Galaxy S9 has a little more vivid display than Blackview BL8800, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixels density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2960. The Galaxy S9 features a slightly better camera than Blackview BL8800, because although it has a back facing camera with lot less MP, it also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better photography and videos in low light environments.
The Galaxy S9 counts with more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Blackview BL8800, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 400 GB. The Blackview BL8800 has a much better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has an 8380mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.