Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 12 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-08-21 |
| 7.27 x 3.37 x 0.90 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 18.34 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| -- | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2388 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 391 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 15080mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 13.12 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than the Blackview BV9300, with a 98.9 score against 73.7. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra design is noticeably thinner and notably lighter than Blackview BV9300. Both phones we compare here have Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has 13 version and Blackview BV9300 has Android 12 version, giving you some additional features.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a little sharper screen than Blackview BV9300, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels, a little bigger display and a better pixel density. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a little bit better performance than Blackview BV9300. They have a 12 GB RAM and the same number of cores.
The Blackview BV9300 has a very superior memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1 TB and 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a very superior camera than Blackview BV9300, because it has a back facing camera with lot more megapixels.
Blackview BV9300 counts with a superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has 15080mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.