Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 12 | Android 5.1 |
| -- | 2015-08-13 |
| 7.27 x 3.37 x 0.90 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 18.34 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| -- | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2388 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 391 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 18.62 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.4 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 15080mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 13.12 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has a global score of 79.3, which is just a bit better than the Blackview BV9300's general score of 73.7. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has older 5.1 version and Blackview BV9300 has Android 12. Samsung Galaxy Note 5 is a incredibly thinner and way lighter cellphone than the Blackview BV9300.
The Blackview BV9300 counts with a quite better performance than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 7 more CPU cores and a larger amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy Note 5 features a more vivid screen than Blackview BV9300, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440px resolution and a higher display pixel density.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 shoots better pictures and videos than Blackview BV9300, although it has a back-facing camera with a much lower 16 mega pixels resolution. Blackview BV9300 features a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1 TB and 192 GB more internal storage.
Blackview BV9300 features a way better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 15080mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.