Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 12 | -- |
| -- | 2017-04-21 |
| 7.27 x 3.37 x 0.90 inches | 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| 18.34 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| -- | Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 173.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2388 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 391 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 15080mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 13.12 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S8 has a global score of 81.7, which is better than Blackview BV9300's global score of 73.7. The Samsung Galaxy S8 body is incredibly lighter and much thinner than the Blackview BV9300. The Blackview BV9300 has a bit better CPU than Samsung Galaxy S8, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Blackview BV9300 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy S8 has a much better looking display than Blackview BV9300, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher count of pixels per inch in the display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960. Blackview BV9300 counts with a very superior memory to install games and applications than Galaxy S8, because it has 256 GB internal memory and an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
Blackview BV9300 features a really longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S8, because it has a 403 percent larger battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy S8 captures better photographs and videos than Blackview BV9300, although it has a way lower 12 MP resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.