Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 13 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ is much better than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, getting an 81.2 score against 71.5. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but LG V40 ThinQ has the previous 10 version and Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has Android 13 version. LG V40 ThinQ is a somewhat lighter and a little bit thinner device than the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12.
LG V40 ThinQ has a little better hardware performance than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. The Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 features a much better looking screen than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a lot worse count of pixels per inch in the display and a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2460, it also counts with a quite larger display.
LG V40 ThinQ features a superior camera than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, although it has a lot worse 12 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back. The Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has slightly more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 features a very superior battery life than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 52% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.