Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | -- |
| -- | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 is much better than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, having a general score of 83.8 against 71.5. The Samsung Galaxy A50 body is lighter and just a bit thinner than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12. The Galaxy A50's processing unit is just as good as the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 one, and although the Galaxy A50 has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has an incredibly better screen than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a bit worse pixels number in each screen inch, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2460 resolution and a little larger display. The Galaxy A50 features a superior camera than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, although it has a lot less mega-pixels back camera.
Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has just a bit bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A50, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1 TB. The Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has greater battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a 25% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.