Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50s has an overall score of 86.6, which is much better than the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12's 71.5 global score. Both devices in this comparison review use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A50s has 10 version while Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has Android 13. Galaxy A50s's construction is lighter and a little thinner than the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12.
The Galaxy A50s features a bit superior processing unit than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 counts with an incredibly better display than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because although it has a just a bit lower display pixel density, it also counts with a quite larger screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2460.
Galaxy A50s counts with a much better camera than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, although it has a back facing camera with a much worse resolution. Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 features just a bit more memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 also has a SD extension slot that allows up to 1 TB.
The Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 features better battery life than Galaxy A50s, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.