Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a global score of 97.6, which is way better than the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12's general score of 71.5. The Samsung Galaxy Fold design is somewhat thinner but much heavier than the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12. Both phones we are comparing here use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Fold has newer 9.0 Pie version and Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has Android 13.
The Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has a much better display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit better amount of pixels in each display inch. The Galaxy Fold counts with just a little better hardware performance than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Fold also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy Fold features more storage capacity to install games and applications than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 features just a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy Fold, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Fold shoots much clearer photos and videos than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, although it has a much lower resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.