Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-06-18 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Midnight blue and Seawater blue |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M40 has a general score of 85, which is better than the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12's 71.5 overall score. Both devices in this comparison review work with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy M40 has an older 10 version and Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has Android 13 version. The Samsung Galaxy M40 construction is somewhat lighter and just a bit thinner than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12.
The Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy M40, and although they both have 8 cores, the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 also has a higher amount of RAM. The Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 features a lot better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy M40, because although it has a quite lower count of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels and a little bit bigger display.
Samsung Galaxy M40 takes a lot better photographs and videos than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, although it has a way lower resolution back facing camera. The Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has just a bit more memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M40, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 also has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1 TB.
Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has a much longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy M40, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.