Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 is much better than the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, getting an 88.3 score against 71.5. The Samsung Galaxy S10 body is a lot lighter and just a little bit thinner than the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12. Both of these devices have Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S10 has older 11 version and Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has Android 13.
Samsung Galaxy S10 counts with a little bit better performance than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12. Both of them have the same RAM amount and 8 cores. The Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 features a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy S10, because although it has a way worse 1080 x 2460 resolution and a much worse pixels density, it also counts with a bit larger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 counts with a better camera than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, although it has a way lower 12 MP resolution back camera. The Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has just a bit bigger memory for applications and games than Galaxy S10, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 also has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
The Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 features a much better battery performance than Galaxy S10, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.