Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | -- |
| -- | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10e is a lot better than the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, with a general score of 86.3 against 71.5. Samsung Galaxy S10e's design is notably lighter and just a little bit thinner than the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12. The Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has a way better looking display than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a little bit inferior pixels quantity per inch of display, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2460 and a bigger display.
The Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 features a little bit more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10e, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 also has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with a bit better processor than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy S10e shoots much clearer photos and videos than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, although it has a lot less MP resolution back camera. Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 features a much better battery performance than Galaxy S10e, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.