Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 is much better than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, getting a score of 94.8 against 71.5. Both of these phones have the same Android 13 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't see any differences regarding OS features. Galaxy S20's body is a little thinner and lighter than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12.
Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 features a much better looking display than Galaxy S20, because although it has a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2460 and a much worse pixel density, it also counts with a bit bigger screen. Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 features slightly more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S20, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 also has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
Galaxy S20 features a bit superior processor than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 also has more RAM. The Galaxy S20 features a greater camera than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, although it has a back-facing camera with way less mega-pixels.
Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 features better battery performance than Galaxy S20, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.