Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 FE is much better than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, getting a score of 90.8 against 71.5. Galaxy S20 FE is a a bit lighter phone than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, but both have the same thickness. These phones use Android OS, but the Galaxy S20 FE has an older 11 version and Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has Android 13 version.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE features a bit better processing power than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. The Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has a lot better screen than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has a little bit less pixels per display inch, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2460px.
The Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 features a slightly bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 also has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has just a little bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
The Galaxy S20 FE shoots way better pictures and videos than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, although it has a back camera with way less MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.