Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is much better than the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, getting a 98 score against 71.5. Although it's the best cellphone in this comparison review, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G construction is somewhat heavier and just a little bit thicker than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12. These phones have the same Android 13 OS (operating system), so both should provide the user identical operating system features.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bit better processing power than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has more RAM memory. The Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 counts with an incredibly better screen than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, although it has a much lower resolution of 1080 x 2460, a quite lower pixels density and a little smaller display.
The Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 counts with a slightly better memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 also has a SD card slot that allows up to 1 TB. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G shoots a lot better photographs and videos than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, because it has a back camera with a way higher resolution.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a battery life that is very similar to Blackview Oscal Tiger 12's battery duration.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.