Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 98.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 11 |
| -- | 2021-01-29 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 8.04 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Phantom black and Silver |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 966.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 516 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S21 Ultra has a general score of 98.1, which is much better than the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12's score of 71.5. Both devices in this review come with Android OS, but the Galaxy S21 Ultra has older 11 version while Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has Android 13. Although it's the best in this comparison, the Galaxy S21 Ultra design is just a little thicker and heavier than the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12.
Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 features a slightly better looking display than Galaxy S21 Ultra, because although it has a just a little worse screen density and a lot worse 1080 x 2460 resolution, and they both have a screen with the same size, the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 also counts with way more brightness.
The Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra features a bit faster CPU than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra also has 4 GB more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra counts with a lot better camera than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, because it has a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels.
Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 counts with a way bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 also has an external SD slot that admits up to 1 TB. The Galaxy S21 Ultra's battery lifetime is very similar to the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.