Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 13, 12 |
| -- | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 10.6 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 has a score of 93.4, which is a lot better than the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12's score of 71.5. Both devices we are comparing here include the same Android 13 OS, so both of them should offer the same OS features. The Galaxy S22 body is somewhat lighter and a little bit thinner than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12.
The Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has a little sharper screen than Galaxy S22, because although it has a bit worse screen density, it also counts with much more brightness, a slightly better 1080 x 2460 pixels resolution and a little larger display. Samsung Galaxy S22 features a little better performance than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12. Both of them have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM amount.
Galaxy S22 features a greater camera than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, although it has a way worse resolution back facing camera. The Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 features much more storage to install applications and games than Galaxy S22, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 also has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
The Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 features greater battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S22, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.