Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | -- |
| -- | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 has a score of 79.5, which is much better than the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12's score of 71.5. Galaxy S7 is a lighter and a little thinner cellphone than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12. The Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has just a little better processing power than Galaxy S7, because it has a larger amount of RAM and a greater number of cores.
The Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 features a sharper screen than Galaxy S7, because although it has a little worse 1080 x 2460 resolution and a lot lower pixel amount per display inch, it also counts with a lot brighter display and a lot larger display. The Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has a much better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1 TB and more internal memory.
Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 counts with a way better battery duration than Galaxy S7, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh. Galaxy S7 captures better photos and videos than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, although it has a lot worse 12 mega pixels resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.