Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| Android 13 | Android 5.1 |
| -- | 2015-09-02 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 5.43 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Black, Gold, Green and White |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 409.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 10.6 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 430 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 23.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (60 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2900mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 520 hours standby time 13.2 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xperia Z5 is just a bit better than the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, with a 77.6 score against 71.5. The Xperia Z5 is a somewhat thinner and noticeably lighter cellphone than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Xperia Z5 has older 5.1 version while Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has Android 13.
The Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has a more vivid display than Xperia Z5, because although it has a bit lower pixel density, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels and a lot bigger display. The Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 features a much greater storage to store more apps and games than Xperia Z5, because it has a SD extension slot that admits up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal memory.
The Xperia Z5 has a bit superior CPU than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, and they both have 8 CPU cores, the Xperia Z5 also counts with an additional graphics processor. The Sony Xperia Z5 counts with a much better camera than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, although it has a lot less mega pixels back camera.
Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 features a way better battery performance than Sony Xperia Z5, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2900mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.