Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 93.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 13 | -- |
| -- | 2020-04-21 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Alpine white and Solstice grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 13.86 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro has a general score of 93.1, which is much better than the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12's 71.5 general score. The Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro design is just a little heavier and just a little thicker than the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12. The Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro has a bit better processing unit than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12. Both have 8 cores and the same RAM memory amount.
The Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has a lot better looking display than Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro, because it has a little bit bigger screen, much more display brightness, a little bit more pixels per display inch and a bit higher 1080 x 2460 resolution. Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 counts with a better storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows up to 1 TB.
The Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro shoots way better pictures and videos than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, because it has a camera in the back with a way better resolution. Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 counts with just a little better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.