Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 53.9 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| BLU | HTC |
| Android 4.2 | Android 5.0 |
| -- | 2015-03-01 |
| 5.67 x 2.87 x 0.35 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| -- | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 179.00 | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 3 |
| 294 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek MT6589 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| PowerVR SGX544 (384 MHz) GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 8.28 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| -- | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.03 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 850 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 3.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The HTC One M9 has a general score of 77.7, which is way better than BLU Life One's 53.9 global score. The HTC One M9 is a just a little thicker and a little heavier device than BLU Life One. Both devices in this comparison have Android OS, but the HTC One M9 has a newer 5.0 version and BLU Life One has Android 4.2 version, providing a couple nice extra features.
HTC One M9 counts with a much powerful processor than BLU Life One, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory, 4 more cores, a 64-bit processing unit and a better 600 MHz graphics co-processor. HTC One M9 features a brighter screen than BLU Life One, and although they both have a same size display, the HTC One M9 also has a way higher 1920 x 1080px resolution and a better pixels number in each inch of display.
The HTC One M9 takes much clearer photos and videos than BLU Life One, because it has a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a back facing camera with a lot higher resolution. HTC One M9 has a much bigger storage for applications and games than BLU Life One, because it has 32 GB internal storage and a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 128 GB.
The HTC One M9 features a way better battery lifetime than BLU Life One, because it has a 42% more battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone in our current comparison, the HTC One M9 is also cheaper than the other phone, making it easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.