Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 43.5 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| BLU | LG |
| Android 4.2 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-05-10 |
| 4.61 x 2.44 x 0.43 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 3.56 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| White | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 320 x 480 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 165 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Dual-Core 1000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 256 MB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 7.83 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 524,29 MB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 2.86 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 1.30 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 4.51 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1300mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 700 hours standby time 15 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.04 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has a global score of 83.7, which is much better than the BLU Neo 3.5's score of 43.5. LG V50 ThinQ is a incredibly heavier but extremely thinner device than the BLU Neo 3.5. Both devices in this review work with Android OS (operating system), but LG V50 ThinQ has a more recent 10 version and BLU Neo 3.5 has Android 4.2, providing you a lot of extra features and improved performance.
LG V50 ThinQ has a lot better hardware performance than BLU Neo 3.5, because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with more RAM memory and a larger number of cores. The LG V50 ThinQ has a much sharper display than BLU Neo 3.5, because it has a way larger screen, a much better amount of pixels per inch of display and a much better 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a much bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than BLU Neo 3.5, because it has 127,49 GB more internal memory capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The LG V50 ThinQ has a much longer battery life than BLU Neo 3.5, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 1300mAh.
The LG V50 ThinQ takes greater pictures and videos than BLU Neo 3.5, because it has a way better 3840x2160 video quality and a much more mega pixels camera in the back.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we compare here, LG V50 ThinQ is also cheaper than the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.