| Global Score | |
| 43.5 | 47.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| BLU | Motorola |
| Android 4.2 | Android 2.2, 2.1, 2.0 |
| -- | 2009-10-28 |
| 4.61 x 2.44 x 0.43 inches | 4.56 x 2.36 x 0.54 inches |
| 3.56 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| White | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 120.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.5 inches | 3.7 inches |
| 320 x 480 pixels | 480 x 854 pixels |
| TFT | TFT |
| 165 pixels per inch | 265 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7 | 7.7 |
| Performance | |
| -- | TI OMAP3430 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Dual-Core 1000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A8 (Single-Core 600 MHz) processor |
| 256 MB RAM | 256 MB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 (500 MHz) GPU | PowerVR SGX530 (200 MHz) GPU |
| 7.83 | 6.93 |
| Storage | |
| 524,29 MB internal memory | -- |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 2.86 | 1.32 |
| Camera | |
| 1.30 MP | 5.00 MP |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 720 x 480 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 4.51 | 6.05 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | EV-DO A and CDMA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | -- |
| 4.6 | 2.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1300mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1400mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 700 hours standby time 15 hours talk time | 270 hours standby time 6.4 hours talk time |
| 3.04 | 3.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 2.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Motorola Droid is just a bit better than BLU Neo 3.5, having a general score of 47.5 against 43.5. Both of these devices have Android OS, but the Motorola Droid has an older 2.2 version while BLU Neo 3.5 has Android 4.2 version. Despite being the best phone in this comparison review, the Motorola Droid is a heavier and much thicker phone than BLU Neo 3.5.
The Motorola Droid features a better display than BLU Neo 3.5, because it has a way better 854 x 480px resolution, a bit bigger screen and way more pixels per screen inch. BLU Neo 3.5 features a better performing processor than Motorola Droid, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the BLU Neo 3.5 also has a better GPU working at 500 megahertz and 1 more cpu cores.
Motorola Droid features a much better camera than BLU Neo 3.5, and although they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Droid also has a back-facing camera with a way better 5 mega pixels resolution. BLU Neo 3.5 counts with a superior storage capacity for applications and games than Motorola Droid, because it has an external SD slot that holds up to 64 GB.
The Motorola Droid has a bit longer battery lifetime than BLU Neo 3.5, because it has 1400mAh of battery capacity against 1300mAh.
In addition to being the best phone in our comparison, Motorola Droid is also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.