Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 50.4 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| BLU | LG |
| Android 4.0 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.24 x 2.64 x 0.43 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 245 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Nvidia Tegra 3 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Quad-Core 1500 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ULP GeForce GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 6.82 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 750 hours standby time 16 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ has an overall score of 83.7, which is much better than BLU Quattro 4.5's score of 50.4. Both devices in this comparison have Android OS, but LG V50 ThinQ has newer 10 version while BLU Quattro 4.5 has Android 4.0 version. LG V50 ThinQ's design is heavier but thinner than BLU Quattro 4.5.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a better hardware performance than BLU Quattro 4.5, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and a greater number of cores. LG V50 ThinQ features a more vivid display than BLU Quattro 4.5, because it has a really larger screen, much more pixels per inch in the display and a way higher resolution of 1440 x 3120.
The LG V50 ThinQ shoots greater photographs and videos than BLU Quattro 4.5, because it has a much more mega-pixels back-facing camera and a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality. LG V50 ThinQ counts with much more storage capacity to install applications and games than BLU Quattro 4.5, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB and more internal memory capacity.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a really longer battery lifetime than BLU Quattro 4.5, because it has a 122% bigger battery capacity.
LG V50 ThinQ not only is the best devices between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheap compared to the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.