Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 54.5 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| BLU | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 4.4.4 |
| -- | 2014-10-28 |
| 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.35 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and Blue |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 139.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8926 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 305 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 4.62 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 650 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.16 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola DROID Turbo is much better than BLU Studio 5.0 HD LTE, having a 77.9 score against 54.5. Both phones in this comparison include Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola DROID Turbo has the newer 4.4.4 version and BLU Studio 5.0 HD LTE has Android 4.4.2, so it offers a couple nice extra features and performance enhancements. The Motorola DROID Turbo is a just a little bit heavier and way thicker cellphone than BLU Studio 5.0 HD LTE.
The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a superior processing unit than BLU Studio 5.0 HD LTE, and although they both have 4 processing cores, the Motorola DROID Turbo also has a faster 500 megahertz graphics co-processor and 2 GB more RAM memory. The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a brighter screen than BLU Studio 5.0 HD LTE, because it has a quite bigger display, a lot higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px and way more pixels per inch of display.
The Motorola DROID Turbo has a superior storage capacity for games and applications than BLU Studio 5.0 HD LTE, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 64 GB internal memory. Motorola DROID Turbo features a really longer battery duration than BLU Studio 5.0 HD LTE, because it has a 3900mAh battery capacity against 2200mAh.
The Motorola DROID Turbo has a lot better camera than BLU Studio 5.0 HD LTE, because it has a lot more mega pixels back-facing camera and a lot higher 3840x2160 video definition.
In addition to being the best phone in our current comparison, Motorola DROID Turbo is also cheaper than the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.