Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 52.5 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| BLU | LG |
| Android 4.3, 4.2.2 | -- |
| -- | 2016-09-29 |
| 5.73 x 2.85 x 0.35 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Green, Pink and White | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 115.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 220 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8926 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Quad-Core 1400 MHz processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 305 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.55 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 4.26 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.60 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 29.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.38 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 800 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V20 has a global score of 77, which is way better than the BLU Studio 5.0 LTE's overall score of 52.5. The LG V20 design is thinner but just a bit heavier than BLU Studio 5.0 LTE. LG V20 has a bit better hardware performance than BLU Studio 5.0 LTE, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, and they both have the same number of cores, the LG V20 also counts with a higher amount of RAM memory.
LG V20 counts with a much better looking display than BLU Studio 5.0 LTE, because it has a quite bigger screen, a much higher pixel count per inch of screen and a way higher resolution of 1440 x 2560. The LG V20 features a greater camera than BLU Studio 5.0 LTE, because it has a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels and a much better 3840x2160 video definition.
LG V20 features a way bigger memory for applications and games than BLU Studio 5.0 LTE, because it has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and more internal storage capacity. The LG V20 features a much longer battery lifetime than BLU Studio 5.0 LTE, because it has 3200mAh of battery capacity against 2000mAh.
The LG V20 and the BLU Studio 5.0 LTE cost exactly the same, making this phone an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.