Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 49.5 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| BLU | LG |
| Android 4.4 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.45 x 2.81 x 0.37 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Orange, Pink, White and Yellow | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 199 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6582 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 6.82 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 900 hours standby time 24 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has an overall score of 83.7, which is much better than BLU Studio C mini's global score of 49.5. The LG V50 ThinQ is a heavier but thinner cellphone than the BLU Studio C mini. Both devices in this review have Android OS (Operating System), but the LG V50 ThinQ has a more recent 10 version and BLU Studio C mini has Android 4.4 version.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a better screen than BLU Studio C mini, because it has a way better 1440 x 3120px resolution, a lot greater display pixels density and a much bigger display. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a better performing processing unit than BLU Studio C mini, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with a larger number of cores and more RAM memory.
The LG V50 ThinQ captures a lot better pictures and videos than BLU Studio C mini, because it has a lot more MP back-facing camera and a lot better (4K) video definition. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than BLU Studio C mini, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a really longer battery performance than BLU Studio C mini, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 2000mAh.
The LG V50 ThinQ not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheap compared to the BLU Studio C mini, making this phone a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.