| Global Score | |
| 57.9 | 63.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| BLU | ZTE |
| Android 4.2 | Android 5.1 |
| -- | 2015-07-14 |
| 5.71 x 2.76 x 0.22 inches | 6.06 x 2.90 x 0.37 inches |
| 4.69 ounces | 5.99 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Blue, Gold and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum; plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | TFT |
| 441 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6592 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Octa-Core 1700 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Single-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-450 (650 MHz) GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 4.4 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 7.92 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 750 hours standby time 24 hours talk time | 300 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 4.24 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
The ZTE Axon is slightly better than the BLU Vivo IV, getting a 63.1 score against 57.9. Although it's the best we are comparing, the ZTE Axon is a thicker and way heavier cellphone than BLU Vivo IV. These phones work with Android OS, but the ZTE Axon has the newer 5.1 version while BLU Vivo IV has Android 4.2 version.
BLU Vivo IV counts with just a little better hardware performance than ZTE Axon, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the BLU Vivo IV also has a higher number of cores (although slower) and an additional graphics processing unit. The BLU Vivo IV has just a bit better looking screen than ZTE Axon, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have the same 1920 x 1080 resolution, the BLU Vivo IV also counts with a bit better pixel count per inch of screen.
The ZTE Axon counts with a much better memory capacity for applications and games than BLU Vivo IV, because it has 16 GB more internal storage capacity. ZTE Axon features superior battery duration than BLU Vivo IV, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2300mAh. ZTE Axon has a way better camera than BLU Vivo IV, and although they both have a same resolution back camera, the ZTE Axon also has a way better 3840x2160 video definition.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the ZTE Axon is also cheap compared to the BLU Vivo IV, which makes this phone an easy choice.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.