Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 48.4 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| BLU | LG |
| Windows Phone 8.1 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-05-10 |
| 4.92 x 2.52 x 0.42 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.41 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Orange, Pink, White and Yellow | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 233 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 302 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.28 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 6.71 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1950mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 700 hours standby time 19 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.84 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has a score of 83.7, which is a lot better than BLU Win Jr's 48.4 overall score. LG V50 ThinQ is a way thinner but a lot heavier phone than the BLU Win Jr. The LG V50 ThinQ has Android 10 operating system, and BLU Win Jr comes with Windows Phone 8.1 operating system. LG V50 ThinQ features a faster CPU than BLU Win Jr, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processing unit, it also counts with more cores and a larger amount of RAM.
LG V50 ThinQ features a lot better looking display than BLU Win Jr, because it has a much better amount of pixels per inch in the display, a lot larger display and a much better resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a way bigger storage to store more games and applications than BLU Win Jr, because it has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB and 124 GB more internal storage.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a really longer battery life than BLU Win Jr, because it has a 105 percent greater battery capacity. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a lot better camera than BLU Win Jr, because it has a way higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a much higher 12 megapixels resolution back facing camera.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, LG V50 ThinQ is also the cheapest, making it an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.