Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 67.7 | 74.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Cat | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-08-20 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.24 x 3.02 x 0.47 inches | 5.91 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.75 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 586.00 | $ 311.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.9 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1520 x 720 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 285 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One is a bit better than CAT S62 Pro, having a general score of 74.3 against 67.7. Even though the Motorola One is older than the CAT S62 Pro, it's body is lighter and extremely thinner. Both phones in this comparison work with Android OS, but Motorola One has a more recent 9.0 Pie version while CAT S62 Pro has Android 10, counting with a couple nice extra features and increased performance.
The CAT S62 Pro features a much better looking display than Motorola One, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen and a way better resolution of 1080 x 2160px. The CAT S62 Pro features a very superior memory for applications and games than Motorola One, and although they both have a SD card slot that holds up to 256 GB, the CAT S62 Pro also has 64 GB more internal memory capacity.
CAT S62 Pro features a bit better processing unit than Motorola One, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the CAT S62 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM. The CAT S62 Pro has greater battery duration than Motorola One, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity. Motorola One captures just a bit better pictures and videos than CAT S62 Pro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light captures, it also counts with a camera with a better 13 megapixels resolution and a way higher (4K) video definition.
The Motorola One is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a lot cheaper, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.