Compare phones
HTC Radar
4G T-Mobile| Global Score | |
| 49.1 | 54 |
| Basic Information | |
| Celkon | HTC |
| Android 4.4.2 | Windows Phone 7.5 Mango 7.5 Mango |
| -- | 2011-09-01 |
| 5.73 x 2.86 x 0.39 inches | 4.74 x 2.42 x 0.43 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 4.83 ounces |
| White | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 199.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 3.8 inches |
| 480 x 854 pixels | 480 x 800 pixels |
| TFT | S-LCD |
| 196 pixels per inch | 246 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6582 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon S2 MSM8255 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor | Scorpion (Single-Core 1000 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 512 MB (333 MHz) RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 MP2 (416 MHz) GPU | Adreno 205 (245 MHz) GPU |
| 8.46 | 7.56 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 8 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 3.82 | 3.3 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution |
| 6.38 | 6.82 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| EDGE, GPRS and GSM | HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM |
| SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 3.4 | 3.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1520mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 22 hours talk time | 480 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 3.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 2.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
HTC Radar has a global score of 54, which is much better than the Celkon Q3000's overall score of 49.1. HTC Radar is a lighter but just a little thicker cellphone than the Celkon Q3000. HTC Radar counts with Windows Phone 7.5 Mango 7.5 Mango operating system, and Celkon Q3000 works with Android 4.4.2 operating system.
Celkon Q3000 counts with a more powerful CPU than HTC Radar, because it has 3 more cores, a much better graphics co-processor and more RAM. The HTC Radar counts with a little more vivid display than Celkon Q3000, because although it has a really smaller display and a little worse resolution of 800 x 480 pixels, it also counts with a greater pixels density.
The Celkon Q3000 has a better storage for apps and games than HTC Radar, because although it has only 4 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 32 GB. The Celkon Q3000 has a much longer battery life than HTC Radar, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity instead of 1520mAh.
HTC Radar captures a bit better pictures and videos than Celkon Q3000, although it has a back-facing camera with a way lower resolution.
HTC Radar is not only the best devices in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, which makes buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.