Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 52.4 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Celkon | LG |
| Android 4.4 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.73 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.26 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| White | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Broadcom BCM23550 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Broadcom VideoCore IV (250 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.28 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 6.49 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 300 hours standby time 7 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.48 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is much better than Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra, having a global score of 83.7 against 52.4. Both devices we compare here use Android OS (operating system), but LG V50 ThinQ has a newer 10 version and Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra has Android 4.4. Even being the best we are comparing here, LG V50 ThinQ's body is just a bit thicker and somewhat heavier than Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a faster CPU than Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processor, it also counts with more RAM memory and 4 more cpu cores. The LG V50 ThinQ features a much better looking display than Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra, because it has a larger screen, a lot greater display density and a much better 1440 x 3120px resolution.
LG V50 ThinQ features much more memory to install applications and games than Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB. The LG V50 ThinQ has a superior battery performance than Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra, because it has a 60 percent more battery size.
LG V50 ThinQ shoots much clearer videos and photos than Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra, because it has a way better 3840x2160 video quality and a back-facing camera with way more MP.
LG V50 ThinQ not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheap compared to the Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra, making this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.