Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 48.6 | 53.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Celkon | HTC |
| Windows Phone 8.1 | Windows Phone 7.5 Mango |
| -- | 2010-10-11 |
| 4.94 x 2.56 x 0.41 inches | 4.70 x 2.42 x 0.51 inches |
| 4.25 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Black and White | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 140.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 3.8 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 480 x 800 pixels |
| -- | LCD |
| 233 pixels per inch | 246 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.7 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 QSD8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Scorpion (Single-Core 1000 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 448 MB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 200 (128 MHz) GPU |
| 8.37 | 7.47 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 3.82 | 4.4 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 5.00 MP |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 1280 x 720 (24 fps) (HD) video resolution |
| 5.94 | 6.16 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM |
| SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 4.6 | 3.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1500mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1230mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 275 hours standby time 4 hours talk time |
| 3.28 | 2.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 2.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The HTC Surround is a bit better than Celkon Win 400, getting a 53.3 score against 48.6. The HTC Surround is a somewhat thicker and incredibly heavier cellphone than Celkon Win 400. The HTC Surround has Windows Phone 7.5 Mango OS, while Celkon Win 400 has Windows Phone 8.1 OS. The Celkon Win 400 counts with a greater processing power than HTC Surround, because it has a faster GPU, a greater amount of RAM and a higher number of faster cores.
The Celkon Win 400 has a slightly better looking screen than HTC Surround, because although it has a just a little lower screen density, and they both have an equal resolution of 800 x 480, the Celkon Win 400 also counts with a quite larger screen. HTC Surround features a slightly better camera than Celkon Win 400. Both of them have a camera with a 5 megapixels, the same video frame rate and the same (HD) video resolution.
The HTC Surround has a better memory to install applications and games than Celkon Win 400, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 16 GB internal storage. Celkon Win 400 features better battery life than HTC Surround, because it has a 22% greater battery capacity.
HTC Surround is not only the best devices between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones, which makes it very easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.