Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 48.6 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Celkon | LG |
| Windows Phone 8.1 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-05-10 |
| 4.94 x 2.56 x 0.41 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.25 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and White | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | OLED |
| 233 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 5.94 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1500mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 3.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is way better than the Celkon Win 400, with a global score of 83.7 against 48.6. The LG V50 ThinQ has Android 10 OS, while Celkon Win 400 works with Windows Phone 8.1 OS. LG V50 ThinQ's construction is thinner but heavier than the Celkon Win 400. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a superior hardware performance than Celkon Win 400, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with 5,5 GB more RAM and a greater number of cores.
LG V50 ThinQ has a sharper screen than Celkon Win 400, because it has a way greater display pixels density, a way higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px and a lot bigger display. LG V50 ThinQ features a much greater memory to store more games and applications than Celkon Win 400, because it has 124 GB more internal storage capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a much longer battery duration than Celkon Win 400, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. LG V50 ThinQ shoots way better videos and photos than Celkon Win 400, because it has a camera with a much better 12 MP resolution and a way higher 3840x2160 video quality.
The LG V50 ThinQ not only is the best devices of the ones we compare here, but it's also cheaper than the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.