Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 65 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Coolpad | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-13 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.53 x 3.17 x 0.33 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.99 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue and White |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 130.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| -- | AMOLED |
| 377 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 is a lot better than Coolpad Legacy, with a general score of 81.6 against 65. Google Pixel 2's design is just a little bit thinner and lighter than the Coolpad Legacy, even though it was released around a year before. Google Pixel 2 features just a little better processing power than Coolpad Legacy, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 2 also has more RAM memory.
Google Pixel 2 features just a bit better looking screen than Coolpad Legacy, because although it has a much smaller display and a little bit lower 1080 x 1920px resolution, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch of display. Google Pixel 2 takes a lot better photos and videos than Coolpad Legacy, because although it has a camera with much less MP, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 video resolution.
Google Pixel 2 counts with a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Coolpad Legacy, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory capacity. The Coolpad Legacy has a much longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Google Pixel 2 is also cheap compared to the Coolpad Legacy.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.