Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 51.3 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Gigabyte | LG |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2014-10-22 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.67 x 2.78 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.15 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| -- | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek MT6582 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali 400 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.19 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 4.62 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.04 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1900mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 150 hours standby time 4.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.76 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ has a score of 83.7, which is much better than the GIGABYTE GSmart Mika M3's 51.3 global score. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but LG V50 ThinQ has 10 version while GIGABYTE GSmart Mika M3 has Android 4.4.2 version. LG V50 ThinQ's body has the same thickness than the GIGABYTE GSmart Mika M3, but it is incredibly heavier.
LG V50 ThinQ has a superior performance than GIGABYTE GSmart Mika M3, because it has 5 GB more RAM memory and a higher number of cores. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bit sharper screen than GIGABYTE GSmart Mika M3, because it has a lot greater pixel count per inch in the screen, a lot better 1440 x 3120 resolution and a larger display.
The LG V50 ThinQ captures much clearer videos and photos than GIGABYTE GSmart Mika M3, although it has a lesser megapixels back-facing camera. LG V50 ThinQ features a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than GIGABYTE GSmart Mika M3, because it has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB and 120 GB more internal memory capacity.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a much better battery life than GIGABYTE GSmart Mika M3, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 1900mAh.
The LG V50 ThinQ is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheaper than the GIGABYTE GSmart Mika M3.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.