Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 49.6 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Gigabyte | LG |
| Android 4.2 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.67 x 2.87 x 0.37 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and White | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8230 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB (533 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 305 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 1.32 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/3.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.59 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1900mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 150 hours standby time 2.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.76 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has a global score of 83.7, which is much better than GIGABYTE GSmart Simba SX1's 49.6 general score. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the LG V50 ThinQ has a more recent 10 version while GIGABYTE GSmart Simba SX1 has Android 4.2 version. The LG V50 ThinQ is a thinner but a bit heavier cellphone than GIGABYTE GSmart Simba SX1.
LG V50 ThinQ has a bit more vivid display than GIGABYTE GSmart Simba SX1, because it has a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3120px, much more pixels per inch of display and a larger display. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a superior processing unit than GIGABYTE GSmart Simba SX1, because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with more RAM memory and a greater number of cores.
LG V50 ThinQ features a very superior storage to install applications and games than GIGABYTE GSmart Simba SX1, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V50 ThinQ features a much better battery performance than GIGABYTE GSmart Simba SX1, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 1900mAh.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much better camera than GIGABYTE GSmart Simba SX1, because although it has a back facing camera with a lower resolution, it also counts with a much bigger camera aperture.
The LG V50 ThinQ is not only the best devices between the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheaper than the GIGABYTE GSmart Simba SX1.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.