Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 47.6 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Gigabyte | LG |
| Android 4.2 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-05-10 |
| 4.90 x 2.52 x 0.41 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.06 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| -- | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 233 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek MT6572 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Dual-Core 1000 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-400 (Dual-Core 500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.28 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 5.83 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1300mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 150 hours standby time 4.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.04 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is way better than GIGABYTE GSmart T4 (Lite Edition), having a global score of 83.7 against 47.6. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but the LG V50 ThinQ has 10 version and GIGABYTE GSmart T4 (Lite Edition) has Android 4.2. The LG V50 ThinQ construction is incredibly heavier but thinner than GIGABYTE GSmart T4 (Lite Edition).
LG V50 ThinQ has a greater processing power than GIGABYTE GSmart T4 (Lite Edition), because although it has doesn't have an extra GPU, it also counts with a higher number of cores (and faster) and a higher amount of RAM. LG V50 ThinQ has a better looking display than GIGABYTE GSmart T4 (Lite Edition), because it has a much higher resolution of 1440 x 3120, a much bigger display and much more pixels per screen inch.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than GIGABYTE GSmart T4 (Lite Edition), because it has an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal memory. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a very superior battery lifetime than GIGABYTE GSmart T4 (Lite Edition), because it has a 208 percent larger battery size.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a very superior camera than GIGABYTE GSmart T4 (Lite Edition), because it has a lot more mega pixels camera.
LG V50 ThinQ not only is the best devices in our current comparison, but it's also the cheapest one, which makes buying this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.