Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2015-10-20 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.79 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Plastic | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 429.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.73 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is much better than the Google Nexus 5X, having an 87.1 score against 73.7. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a way newer cellphone than the Google Nexus 5X, although it's a little bit thicker and incredibly heavier. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much better looking screen than Google Nexus 5X, because although it has a just a bit inferior quantity of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bigger screen.
The Google Nexus 5X counts with a much faster CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 10 GB lesser RAM and less processing cores (although faster). Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much greater storage for applications and games than Google Nexus 5X, because it has 480 GB more internal memory.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a greater camera than Google Nexus 5X, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low-light photography and videos, a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels, faster video frame rate and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a way better image quality.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a way better battery lifetime than Google Nexus 5X, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.