Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-10-20 | 2019-12-04 |
| 5.79 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 429.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Hyper is a bit better than the Google Nexus 5X, having a 79.8 score against 73.7. The Motorola One Hyper body is a lot newer, but incredibly heavier and somewhat thicker than the Google Nexus 5X. Google Nexus 5X features a little bit better screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 1920px resolution and a lot smaller display, it also counts with a just a little greater pixel density.
Motorola One Hyper has a little better processing power than Google Nexus 5X, because it has a larger number of cores and a higher amount of RAM. Motorola One Hyper counts with a much better memory to install applications and games than Google Nexus 5X, because it has more internal memory capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Motorola One Hyper features a way better battery lifetime than Google Nexus 5X, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity. Motorola One Hyper features a better camera than Google Nexus 5X, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same video definition, the Motorola One Hyper also has a lot more mega-pixels back camera and a larger aperture to capture better photos and video in low-light environments.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Motorola One Hyper is also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.