Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-10-20 | 2020-10-02 |
| 5.79 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 429.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) is much better than the Google Nexus 5X, having a score of 87 against 73.7. Motorola razr (2020)'s design has the same thickness than Google Nexus 5X, but it's a lot heavier. The Google Nexus 5X has a bit sharper screen than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 1920 resolution and a just a little greater pixel density.
The Motorola razr (2020) features just a bit better performance than Google Nexus 5X, because it has a higher amount of RAM and a higher number of faster cores. Motorola razr (2020) counts with a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Google Nexus 5X, because it has 224 GB more internal storage.
Motorola razr (2020) has a bit superior battery performance than Google Nexus 5X, because it has a 2800mAh battery size instead of 2700mAh. The Motorola razr (2020) shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Google Nexus 5X, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a lot more megapixels back facing camera, a bigger aperture and a bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Google Nexus 5X, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Google Nexus 5X. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy Google Nexus 5X, letting go a couple features and specs, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.