Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2015-10-20 | 2020-07-16 |
| 5.79 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Prism bricks black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 429.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is a lot better than the Google Nexus 5X, getting a overall score of 92.9 against 73.7. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is a extremely newer device than the Google Nexus 5X, but it's heavier and just a little thicker. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a display that is very similar to the Google Nexus 5X one, because although the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a just a little worse amount of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a larger display.
Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a bit better hardware performance than Google Nexus 5X, because it has 6 GB more RAM memory and a greater number of faster cores. Galaxy A71 5G UW shoots way better pictures and videos than Google Nexus 5X, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a much larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a back-facing camera with a way higher 64 MP resolution and a larger diafragm aperture.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a very superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Nexus 5X, because it has an external SD slot that holds up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy A71 5G UW features a way better battery duration than Google Nexus 5X, because it has a 67% bigger battery size.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW costs a lot more money than the Google Nexus 5X, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.