Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2015-10-20 | -- |
| 5.79 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 4.80 ounces | -- |
| Black, Blue and White | -- |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 429.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.73 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 5.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 Ultra has a general score of 90.7, which is much better than the Google Nexus 5X's general score of 73.7. The Galaxy S25 Ultra design is way lighter and notably thinner than Google Nexus 5X. Google Nexus 5X features a much better performance than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has lesser RAM and less CPU cores.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much better looking screen than Google Nexus 5X, because it has a much larger screen, a bit higher screen pixels density and a way better resolution of 1440 x 3088. The Galaxy S25 Ultra shoots much clearer photos and videos than Google Nexus 5X, because it has a bigger camera aperture to take better photos and videos in poorly lited environments, a much better 7680x4320 video quality, a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing lot better quality photos and a camera with a much higher 200 MP resolution.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra features a very superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Google Nexus 5X, because it has more internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a really longer battery lifetime than Google Nexus 5X, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 2700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.