Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2015-10-20 | 2020-04-04 |
| 5.79 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 429.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 424 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a bit better than Google Nexus 5X, with a overall score of 80.1 against 73.7. Although the Galaxy XCover FieldPro is noticeably newer than Google Nexus 5X, it's extremely heavier and thicker. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a slightly better looking screen than Google Nexus 5X, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixel density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has just a little better hardware performance than Google Nexus 5X, because it has 2 GB more RAM and a greater number of faster cores. The Google Nexus 5X features a greater camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a much tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a bigger camera sensor which gives a better photo and video quality, a back camera with a higher 12.3 mega pixels resolution and a way higher (4K) video resolution.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Nexus 5X, because it has more internal storage capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 512 GB. Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a way better battery lifetime than Google Nexus 5X, because it has a 67% greater battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Google Nexus 5X, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Google Nexus 5X. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy Google Nexus 5X, letting go a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.