Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 5.1, 5.0 | -- |
| 2014-10-15 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.27 x 3.27 x 0.40 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Blue and White | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1019.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 490 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.54 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3220mAh Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 330 hours standby time 24 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS has an overall score of 84.2, which is slightly better than Google Nexus 6's 81.1 overall score. IPhone XS's construction is a lot newer, much thinner and a bit lighter than Google Nexus 6. The Apple iPhone XS features just a bit better hardware performance than Google Nexus 6, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processor, it also counts with a larger amount of RAM memory, more cores and a 64-bit processing unit.
Google Nexus 6 features just a bit better looking screen than Apple iPhone XS, because it has a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen, a quite bigger display and a quite better resolution of 2560 x 1440. The iPhone XS's memory capacity to install applications and games is just as good as the Google Nexus 6 one, both have equal internal storage.
Google Nexus 6 counts with better battery duration than iPhone XS, because it has a 21% bigger battery capacity. IPhone XS shoots slightly better photos and videos than Google Nexus 6, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a lower 12 megapixels resolution camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better captures and videos in poorly lited situations.
The Apple iPhone XS is not only the best phones in this comparison, but it's also the cheapest, making this phone a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.