Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 5.1, 5.0 | -- |
| 2014-10-15 | 2020-07-08 |
| 6.27 x 3.27 x 0.40 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Blue and White | Surfing blue |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1019.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | LCD |
| 490 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3220mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 330 hours standby time 24 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G 5G Plus has a global score of 82.6, which is a little bit better than the Google Nexus 6's 81.1 score. Even though Moto G 5G Plus is somewhat heavier than Google Nexus 6, it's somewhat thinner and noticeably newer. The Google Nexus 6 counts with a little better performance than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and lesser CPU cores (but faster), it also counts with a graphics co-processor.
The Google Nexus 6 features a better display than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite better 2560 x 1440 resolution and a little bit greater display pixels density. The Moto G 5G Plus has a way better camera than Google Nexus 6, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Moto G 5G Plus also has a bigger aperture for better images and videos in poorly lited environments and a camera in the back with a much higher resolution.
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus has a much bigger storage for applications and games than Google Nexus 6, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus counts with a much longer battery life than Google Nexus 6, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3220mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.