Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 5.1, 5.0 | -- |
| 2014-10-15 | 2019-05-15 |
| 6.27 x 3.27 x 0.40 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Blue and White | Blue and Brown |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1019.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 490 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3220mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 330 hours standby time 24 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Nexus 6 is a bit better than Motorola One Vision, with a score of 81.1 against 80.7. Google Nexus 6's design is way older, just a bit heavier and thicker than Motorola One Vision. The Google Nexus 6 counts with a little faster processor than Motorola One Vision, because although it has 4 lesser cpu cores (although they are faster) and less RAM memory, it also counts with an additional GPU.
Google Nexus 6 has a little sharper screen than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch in the display and a bit higher 2560 x 1440 resolution. Motorola One Vision features a very superior storage for games and applications than Google Nexus 6, because it has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage.
The Motorola One Vision shoots way better photographs and videos than Google Nexus 6, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola One Vision also has a larger aperture to take better captures and videos in poorly lited environments and a camera in the back with much more megapixels.
Motorola One Vision features just a bit better battery performance than Google Nexus 6, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity against 3220mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.