Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 5.1, 5.0 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2014-10-15 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.27 x 3.27 x 0.40 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Blue and White | Cyber shade |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1019.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 490 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3220mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 330 hours standby time 24 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Nexus 6 is a bit better than nubia Red Magic 3S, getting an 81.1 score against 75.8. Despite of the fact Google Nexus 6 is extremely older and just a little bit thicker than the nubia Red Magic 3S, it's body is still lighter. Both devices in this review work with Android OS (Operating System), but Google Nexus 6 has 5.1 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Google Nexus 6 counts with a brighter display than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution and a higher amount of pixels per inch of screen. Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a little faster processing unit than Google Nexus 6, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with 9 GB more RAM memory and a greater number of cores (and also faster).
Nubia Red Magic 3S captures way better pictures and videos than Google Nexus 6, because it has a way more mega pixels back-facing camera, a bigger aperture to take better low-light images and a much better 7680x4320 video quality. The nubia Red Magic 3S has a much better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Nexus 6, because it has more internal storage capacity.
Nubia Red Magic 3S features a very superior battery duration than Google Nexus 6, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Google Nexus 6 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than nubia Red Magic 3S, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as nubia Red Magic 3S. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Google Nexus 6, else you can save a couple dollars and get the nubia Red Magic 3S, resigning a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.