Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 5.1, 5.0 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2014-10-15 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.27 x 3.27 x 0.40 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blue and White | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1019.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 490 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3220mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 330 hours standby time 24 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Nexus 6 has an overall score of 81.1, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A70's general score of 76.9. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but the Google Nexus 6 has 5.1 version and Samsung Galaxy A70 has Android 10. Although it's the best cellphone we are comparing here, the Google Nexus 6 is a noticeably older, way thicker and a little heavier cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy A70.
The Google Nexus 6 has just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A70, because although it has 3 GB lesser RAM and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a graphics processing unit. Google Nexus 6 has a more vivid display than Galaxy A70, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a just a little more pixels per inch in the screen.
Google Nexus 6 takes much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy A70, although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for taking photographs and videos in low light environments, they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution. Galaxy A70 has a way bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Google Nexus 6, because it has a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with a much better battery performance than Google Nexus 6, because it has a 40 percent more battery capacity.
Although Google Nexus 6 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Galaxy A70, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy A70. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Google Nexus 6, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the Galaxy A70, resigning a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.